From lockdown to now: Five years of looking back and moving forward.

Our worlds changed on 23 March 2020.  We were united by a sense of uncertainty, feelings of anxiety, and of confusion around what was to come.  We gathered eyes and mouths agape, in front of TV screens as we were told to stay at home.  The outside world fell silent, roads and skies emptied, non-essential shops closed, workplaces ceased operations with some being asked to work at home or be ‘furloughed’ (a new word for most of us), and keyworkers kept our essential services going. 

Home was a reassuring sanctuary, if you were lucky, surrounded by loving family members.  A time to pause, reflect, look after our basic needs for safety and nourishment.  For many it was a trap that intensified disadvantage, deepened dysfunctional relationships, and a exacerbated their lack of opportunity.  For our youngest children, their worlds became so much smaller.  Some benefitted, some did not.  As lockdown(s) continued, we predicted families would feel the effects in terms of parent relationship pressures, domestic abuse, economic burdens, and children’s development would be compromised or delayed.  It gives none of us any pleasure to say we were right.  

In early years, we started to hear from keyworker parents who needed our support so they could go to work, we delivered for them.  Parents not able to use our services started to appreciate in new ways the work we do, and the shared partnership we have in supporting their children’s development and learning.  Providers, like all businesses, were juggling with the new realities, the economics, and the need for short- to long-term planning, and supporting their own workforce.  Local authorities were contacting us for help in navigating the complexities of Government guidance, financial packages, and the processes needed for business change, so the best possible support could be offered to the whole sector.  We were only too pleased to do what we could, it was something core to our mission.

Like many others, online meetings were something of a grey area for us.  But we soon got to grips with the technology (after many clumsy attempts).  We started to connect as a team to make sense of what was happening on a day-to-day basis.  We began meeting with individual local authority early years leads, for mutual support, sense checking, and information sharing.  This is a time we look back on with great fondness and friendship.  We were in it together.  These exchanges formed the basis of our national support programme ‘Finding Your Way Through’ a structured strategy framework, and a set of actions, approaches and resources we developed and freely gave to the sector.  Then came the idea to offer a weekly/fortnightly online session for local authority leads for peer support, wellbeing, and information sharing.  We called them Coffee Breaks, essentially because we were asking everyone to stop, put the kettle on, and come together with the community for an hour of mutual support, understanding, and collaboration.  What a moment that was, a movement began, and Coffee Breaks became that national space for both unstructured and focused discussion, problem solving, resource sharing, and a safe space for emotional safety.  Five years on, and they continue, for all the same objectives, and they are a pleasure for us to facilitate and provide for our colleagues. 

The lessons learned, from lockdown to the present day are many.  It has become clearer for many who have a stake in our sector that we play an essential role in supporting parents in caring for their children, building their development and joy for learning, and their economic opportunities.  Early years is an essential cog in a large machine that delivers for families across multiple (not single or artificially allocated) outcomes.  Without it, and the impacts are clear.  We have been identifying the increases in children’s developmental delays, speech and language, and SEND and have been adapting approaches to best help their recovery.  However, we know these will continue for many, and risk affecting their school-lives and beyond. 

The past five years have also reminded us of the power of togetherness, our unswerving commitment to the sector, our empathy and affinity with parents and children, and not forgetting our resilience.  That said, there are fragilities that continue despite the ambitions, recognition, and increased spend in the sector.  The need for support, challenge, and community in the sector remains vital.  This needs to include all types of setting or school, group-based or home based, and reaching all practitioners to fully deliver our impacts confidently, healthily, and joyfully for better futures.    




Photo by Lisa from Pexels on Pexels.com

Taking a long look at the policy landscape in early years and childcare


We’re used to change in the early years and childcare sector. Some it we can see coming a mile off, some of it comes unexpectedly. No one saw the Covid pandemic coming in 2020, and the Brexit referendum result was on a knife-edge back in 2016. Recent political uncertainty has led to us having a different minister almost every year for as long as we can remember. Whatever the change, and whenever the moment, we must all take the time to look at the landscape and beyond its horizon. Because of all of this has profound effects on what we do, and how we do it.

Foundations
We have achieved so much as a sector and as a profession. We should be proud of moving from a good cause to an essential element of the welfare state. We have matured in terms of practice, quality, professionalism, research, academic approaches, and data. The public, parents, professionals, and politicians are supportive and interested. That’s a lot to celebrate, but unfortunately, interest does not always result in things being right or fully understood, and so our work is not over yet. But it does provide a great foundation.

Fragile construction
On that foundation though, a fragile construction of disparate parts has been built, attached to various single-minded objectives. We have experienced very many incremental additions to policy, to funding, and to working requirements. Some is focused upon early education, some on closing the gap, some on childcare for working families. All great objectives, and equally invaluable. It is though, a complex jigsaw of inter-related and competing elements all jostling to achieve their stated ambitions. We are still tasked with holding it all together and reconciling targeted and universal provision as the solution to its imperfections. This unstable construction requires us all to be the glue (practitioners, providers, professionals, family facing workers, local authorities, and government departments) in all our various roles and interactions.

System simplicity
It needn’t be like this. The whole system is too complicated and complex. It is not enough to make it easier; it must be simple and easy for children, families, and providers. The system needs to seamlessly and effectively deliver universal services for all, and to do more for those that need it by experiencing the effects of disadvantage and needing additional opportunities. That way we will reach those who need the targeted support, and everyone can get early education and childcare right first time and fully understand it, how to use it, access it, and enjoy the benefits from it. That requires us to ask the important questions around how we make that happen, including abandoning archaic systems, abolishing anachronisms, and adopting the best of technology.

Emerging policy?
Some of this thinking is happening already, and government has committed to continue it. Some was referenced in the Chancellor’s budget statement last autumn, some in the Prime Minister’s Plan for Change in December, and the Secretary of State has regularly committed to early years being her “top priority”. The previous Government’s flagship policies to expand early years entitlements, and to open new wraparound childcare were early decisions in the new governments continued support. But what else can we expect to see in the long-term? We think we shall see:

  1. Wide ranging longer-term reform of early education and childcare across all areas.
  2. Early education will continue to expand as planned and will change in accessibility, affordability, and quality.
  3. Wraparound childcare will evolve, connecting in better ways to the new offer of free breakfast clubs, and we hope to see a new focus on school holiday childcare.
  4. More emphasis on schools being providers/hosts of childcare and early education, or at least better connected to or invested in it, as the issue of ‘school readiness’ will gain prominence as schools experience the effects of the pandemic on families that we have already seen in early years. There shall also be a stronger focus on school attendance, and children’s wellbeing which is inextricably linked.
  5. Increased emphasis on tackling effects of disadvantage. Extension of approaches e.g. Holiday Activities and Food (HAF), Family Hubs, SEND, closing attainment gaps, and being ready to learn through school breakfast clubs.
  6. Centralised practical focus on workforce growth, retention, and status, with fresh approaches to entry routes and qualifications.
  7. Different interest in the quality of provision, and how it is registered and inspected, and excellence through Stronger Practice Hubs.

Our advice to everyone is that:
• We improve all parts of the puzzle to create cohesive strategy, policy, and its application.
• There are simple accessible route maps or customer journeys, making it easiest for those in most need or disadvantage, replacing the need for outreach investment in the long term.
• Existing resources are channelled to the front line, rethinking the risks the over burdensome system is trying to mitigate against.
• A united early years and childcare offer is attached to multiple outcomes and impacts – and not be single-minded.
• We repurpose, redistribute, and reach resources to meet the needs of families that need it most, tackling disadvantage and helping parents’ economic behaviours.
• There needs to be two different funding models applied discerningly. The first: providing childcare for working parents as an incentive to work, and an enabler of it. With simple to access subsidies for any additional paid for services. The second: investment focused and targeted for creating the conditions for social impact, bringing local people into the childcare workforce, funding graduate leadership, and deploying early identification and intervention approaches.

Photo by Steven Hylands on Pexels.com

Let’s think again about school readiness.

I had a really awful time at school.  I was far from ready.  I was unsocialised, anxious, and sensitive.  As a summer born white working-class boy I had already been dealt a difficult hand of cards.  Being at home with mum had not helped me to be school ready for lots of reasons.  Back then, pre-school groups were not readily available in our community, and as a stay-at-home mum, my mother mostly kept me at home, and we had a small family.  I remember attending a pre-school group, once or twice.  I was four years old, and I can still describe the experience in vivid detail, some fifty years later, as it was so traumatising and confusing for me.  It did nothing to help me.  Neither did starting one school for a year before being moved to another for the next.  Making friends was hard, I was different, the culture and curriculum was ill-matched to my learning style and preferences, and that fuelled the fire of the bullying I experienced throughout primary and secondary.  I left as soon as was able, with a meagre handful of qualifications, but with determination to find a world that was a better fit for me.

That’s why I am certain one of our important roles in early years and one of our key moral purposes is to prepare children for all aspects of school.  We should be embracing ‘school readiness’ as a mission and goal for all the children we work with.  But instead, too many of us are resisting this.  We argue the nuances and distinctions of the term ‘school readiness’.  We should focus on activity on outcomes and impacts instead.  I have written about this topic for years.  I’ve been quoted too: “If school readiness means we support children to develop their key skills in communication, speaking, listening and questioning, social and emotional well-being, and physical development, then count me in. If it is about producing learning robots trained to comply with a rigid and inflexible education system, then I am less keen on the idea.” (cited in The complete companion to teaching and leading practice in the early years.  Jarvis P et al 2016).  I still like what I said then, and that was 10 years ago. 

Despite us still having a fragile construction of multiple offers and entitlements to juggle, often attached to single-minded policy objectives, we have a great foundation upon which to build.  Children rely on us to hold it all together and reconcile its creases that I truly hope will be ironed out one day very soon.  We all have to be the glue in our various roles and interactions that help children build the resilience to feel safe and to engage, and to develop and use the skills to communicate and connect with the world around them, of which school is a very big and important part indeed.  Everyone needs to know that and understand ‘school readiness’ in its widest sense to avoid any misconceptions and mistakes.   

This blog was first published on http://www.cypnow.co.uk